Why Modi

Published By : Admin | May 15, 2014 | 15:17 IST

What makes Narendra Modi different?

It is obvious for anyone to ask what is different about Narendra Modi from others. When you meet him your gut feeling tells you, this man is different. But when you go beyond your gut feelings and look at the history of independent India you can list a number of objective factors that make him outstanding. Here is a leader who has both power and passion. We have seen political leaders who had visionary thinking and we have seen some leaders who had an eye for the details, but Narendra Modi can do both. While his eyes are focused on the stars his feet are firmly on the ground. Here we will make an attempt to look some his qualities which make him different and make him standout.

A mass leader:

He has reached to the people in a manner that very few politicians of India have been able to. This is not a political bondage but an emotional chord which Narendra has been able to develop with the common man. His fan following ranges from the urban intelligentsia to the rural masses, among the old and the young, men and women, within India and outside. A large number of people among the Gujarati diaspora spread across continents adore him. He has innovatively used latest technology and social media to connect with a wide range of people across India.

What makes Narendra Modi different?

Obsessed with development:

There is one constant thought in Narendra Modi’s mind- development. To quote an example, just a month before the announcement of Gujarat Assembly elections a few years ago, he had undertaken visit to Switzerland to attract investments in the State. Similarly, in 2012 an election was approaching but Narendra Modi went to Japan in a visit that generated tremendous economic and cultural cooperation between Gujarat and Japan. Obviously, for a politician, getting re-elected and returning to power becomes a priority almost a year ahead of election. For Mr. Narendra Modi even during the year of election, flow of investments in the state was more important than the political work.

why-namo-in2

A scientific approach to problem solving:

The success in Gujarat is due to the approach of Narendra Modi towards any problem. First he sees the problem – not in isolation in its entirety. He spends long time in understanding the problem from all possible angles, because he knows that a problem well understood is half solved. He is an excellent listener. Then he thinks of a solution. He does not take ad hoc steps or looks for a short cut or cosmetic changes. He thinks about permanent and long term solutions with a futuristic vision and transformation from the roots. Then he works out a road map – with clear targets and milestones, objectives and monitorable indicators. It is then that he works out the implementation mechanism.

He chooses not only the right process, right agency but also the right persons. Last, but not the least, he has the capacity to monitor, and follow up. He is not a management graduate, but his wisdom and innovations surpass what is taught in management schools.

His experience of intensely traveling the length and breadth of country in general and in Gujarat as CM makes him understand the problems at the grass-root level and his global exposure as the party general secretary and wide reading give him the right perspective and vision to find solutions to these problems.

Projects with massive impact:

As a strategist he can think of and implement projects at a very fast pace, the results of which have been seen in Gujarat. At times he looks impatient to see the results. While in the rest of the country interlinking of rivers is still an issue under debate, he has successfully inter linked a dozen rivers of the state with a result that water can be seen flowing in the rivers which had dried long back. Similarly laying down 300 Kms. long spread canal in just three years and making water available to the hitherto water scarce parts of the state under Sujalam Sufalam, laying down 56599 K.M. of new transmission lines and 12621 transformers across 18,000 plus villages and 9,681 hamlet-suburbs in just 30 months under Jyotigram, creating statewide water and gas grids, connecting all the villages through broad band under e-gram vishwa gram are all examples of fast implementation of projects of massive scale.

Big and small, both are beautiful:

A master at visualizing and implementing large multi million projects, he does not ignore smaller solutions and local technologies either. He says: “Science should be global, but technology local’ In the water sector, he popularized local solutions like bori bands (putting sand and stones in empty gunny bags and checking the water flow through such bags) and farm ponds. While he looks forward to global expertise in seminars during Vibrant Gujarat Summits, also encourages and respects the experiments and experience of local farmers, accepts suggestions from government employees and regards ideas and opinions given by common man through hundreds of emails and letters that he receives daily.

why-namo-in3

Separating administration from Politics:

He is an objective decision maker. He does not mix political requirement with administration prudence. Even after being reminded of political consequences of an administrative decision he takes the side of objectivity. This is what helped Gujarat administration standing up on its feet and working with professionalism and as per global best practices. A good number of organizations of Gujarat Government have bagged ISO certification which is normally not a requirement for the state machinery.

Understanding the pulse of people:

Mr. Modi belongs to backward caste and hails from a backward region of his home state of Gujarat. In his young age, he faced several problems which a common man faces, particularly problems relating to water and electricity. Having got an opportunity to do something on these fronts, he has aggressively and strategically planned and designed systems to take a call and solve these problems.

All inclusive growth:

He is often criticized for paying more attention on major industrial and infrastructure development and over looking backward regions and backward sections. There can not be a bigger fallacy than this. When he implements Jyotigram Yojana across the state, he does not choose particular area or particular section, it is all inclusive. When he lays state wide gas grid they are not taken to a particular part of the society, they are all inclusive. Announcement of major schemes like Van Bandhu Yojna, Sagar Khedu Yojna, Garib Samrudhi Yojna, UMEED are targeted particularly towards the disadvantaged people; but even these schemes do not exclude any other section of the society of the regions. He works for 55 million Gujaratis.

People’s participation in administration and development:

Having grown up and worked among people, he firmly believes that people are the real change agents. He says that the real fruits of any developmental programme can be cherished if it is converted into a Jan aandolan- people’s movement instead of government’s development programme per se. In a lighter vein he says “Is there a Government resolution directing people to assemble at temples at midnight on Janmashtmi ?”

He therefore, involves people in development programmes, as a strategy. The success story of creation of lakhs of water harvesting structures across the state and Krishsi Mahostavs and Kanya Kelvani Yatra for girl child education in Gujarat can be counted as classic examples of his capacity for converting Government Schemes in to mass movements with people’s participation.

why-namo-in4

Making Governance easier, effective and transparent:

He has been saying “Least governance is the best governance”. With this objective he has used information technology to make the administrative processes simple and effective. The state which has been nowhere in ITES & e-governance in 2001 is now rated as the best e-governed state. This is not to benefit Information technology industries but to make life of common man comfortable while he deals with the government. One-day-governance centres have been set up in most of the important offices of the state, which provide documents and certificates in unimaginably faster time. Now he is taking a step forward with computerization of all the Village Panchayats and with broad band connectivity. E-governance renders transparency too.

Policy driven governance:

Narendra says that “My government does not run on whims and wishes of any individual. Our progress is reforms driven , our reforms are policy driven and our policies are people driven” This approach gives his officers a clear cut direction, confidence to take appropriate and quick decisions and lends transparency and uniformity in the system.

Redressal of Grievances:

Common man’s grievances are being attended to with utmost sincerity. His personal involvement in attending to the grievances through Gujarat’s ‘SWAGAT’ programme, that has set the right tone and sent a message across the machinery. He has not only ensured that the administrative machinery deals with such grievances objectively and sincerely, the systems to physically ensure the same have been set up with use of modern technology. The underlying philosophy is that not the Chief Minister alone but the entire machinery should be made responsive and accountable to such grievances of the people.

why-namo-in5

Innovative approach:

Narendra Modi has shown novel ways to address several problems facing the people and administration which the experts in administration and management could not think of all these years.

Undertaking post earthquake reconstruction by involving peoples’ committees and involving the officers in the post earthquake reconstruction as sensitized individuals rather than rule bound officers is the first example of his novel approach experienced by the state. Other examples include using modern tools to expedite administration of justice like video conferencing between courts and convicts in the jails, setting up Evening Courts and Nari Adalats, creation of people’s committees to manage water resource allocated for drinking and irrigation purpose, Chiranjeevi yojana (tying up with private gynecologists for delivery of BPL women), roaming ration cards, soil health card and many more.

Nothing for himself:

People who are in power are often charged with nepotism and favourtism which they do to their relatives. Narendra Modi is far away from any such charge. He also enjoys an image of fairness and integrity which in the process make him over look his own personal interests and those of his near and dear ones. It can be perceived as a negative trait in the personality of a common man but for a statesman, it contributes to the society. Even his worst critics accept the fact that the extent of corruption in the state machinery has gone down at all levels.

As per the norms, gifts received by Narendra Modi in his capacity as the Chief Minister are to be deposited in toshakhana, they are then auctioned and proceeds deposited in state’s treasury. Not only this, he found a novel way for utilization of these funds. The proceeds are diverted to Kanya Kelvani Nidhi, a fund dedicated for education of girl child. The result is that, influenced by such a dedication of their beloved leader, the people now felicitate him cheques worth lakhs of rupees for the fund.

Doing things differently:

The model of Governance which Narendra Modi has evolved in Gujarat is based upon performance not appeasement. When it came to fixing rational electricity charges, he went by the professional advice given by the Electricity Regulatory Commission. Even in the midst of farmers agitation, he did not buckle. Instead he assured the farmers that he understands their requirements. They need water too and not only electricity. In the following years, he implemented surface water schemes like Sujalam Suflam. Now the farmers can get water for irrigation in much lesser costs because the water tables have risen up. A large number of encroachments were removed during the Urban Year. A large number of electricity thefts have been caught and people booked. No agitations and no bad blood. People know that its for them in the long run. There are several such examples. His objectivity and professionalism, personal integrity and empathy for the common man separate him from other politicians of the country and the world. His conviction of purpose and sincerity have made him popular leader not only in the State of Gujarat but also in the country. Adjudged as the Best Chief Minister of the country for the fourth year in a row and also the chief minister with longest tenure in Gujarat, he has proved that “Good Governance is also Good Politics”. Not only that, he has been a trend setter in the paradigm shift from appeasement politics to developmental politics.

These are some of the traits that make Narendra Modi different and a change India eagerly awaits!

 

Disclaimer:

It is part of an endeavour to collect stories which narrate or recount people’s anecdotes/opinion/analysis on Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi & his impact on lives of people.

Explore More
শ্ৰী ৰাম জনমভূমি মন্দিৰৰ ধ্বজাৰোহণ উৎসৱত প্ৰধানমন্ত্ৰীৰ সম্বোধনৰ অসমীয়া অনুবাদ

Popular Speeches

শ্ৰী ৰাম জনমভূমি মন্দিৰৰ ধ্বজাৰোহণ উৎসৱত প্ৰধানমন্ত্ৰীৰ সম্বোধনৰ অসমীয়া অনুবাদ
One App For 2,400-Plus Government Services: How UMANG Is Changing Access In India

Media Coverage

One App For 2,400-Plus Government Services: How UMANG Is Changing Access In India
NM on the go

Nm on the go

Always be the first to hear from the PM. Get the App Now!
...
Narendra Modi is a leader beyond ceremony
February 28, 2026

Force of habit, maybe. Or just the low-grade anxiety that comes with handing something to the prime minister of 1.4 billion people and hoping it works. I scribbled a quick line on the corner of my notepad, confirmed the ink was flowing, and handed it over.

He took it without looking at the pen. He was looking at me.

That was the first thing I noticed about Narendra Modi up close. The eye contact. Steady, unhurried, the kind that makes you feel like the meeting isn’t scheduled. He greeted me standing, which I hadn’t expected, and when he shook my hand, the grip was firm, and it lasted a beat longer than these things usually do. Just deliberate. Like he wanted you to know he meant it.

He apologized for the wait. The Israeli security detail outside his King David suite had put me through more checks than I care to describe. At one point, I was fairly certain I was going to be turned away despite holding a personal invitation from the man himself, which would have made for an interesting column but a frustrating afternoon.

Modi had heard about the delay and said sorry before anything else. I told him it was the Israeli side causing the trouble, not his team. He smiled. The room loosened slightly.

Then he picked up the special front page we had published for his visit, looked at it for a moment, and wrote in Hindi, standing, without sitting down or making any ceremony out of it. Two lines: “Humanity will remain supreme. Democracy will remain eternal.”

He signed his name and dated it February 26, 2026. The whole thing took maybe 45 seconds. He handed the page back with both hands.

I’ve interviewed a lot of people while in this job. Politicians, presidents, religious leaders, celebrities. There is a type of public figure who has spent so many years being watched that everything they do has become a kind of performance. The handshake, the pause, the practiced sincerity. Modi wasn’t that. Whatever he was doing in that suite, he was just there, fully, in a way that is rarer than it sounds.

Through a translator, you could still hear the rhythm of how he thinks. Complete thoughts. Real pauses, not to buy time, but because he’s actually considering what you said.

At one point, I told him his Knesset speech – delivered the day before, the first ever by an Indian prime minister to Israel’s parliament – felt historic. He received it simply, without deflecting or inflating it, and then said something that stayed with me: “Our nations and religions are a lot more similar than what people think.”

He had spent the previous day making exactly that case. Not as a diplomatic courtesy. As a philosophical argument.

Most leaders who come to Jerusalem talk about security, trade, and technology. Modi did that, too, and then he went somewhere else entirely. He gave what I can only describe as a civilizational speech, one that asked a genuinely interesting question: What happens when two of the world’s oldest living cultures finally look at each other carefully and recognize something familiar?

Tikkun Olam and Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam

HIS ANSWER was built on a comparison that sounds simple until you think about it. He placed Tikkun Olam (the Jewish concept of repairing and healing the world) next to Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (the ancient Sanskrit declaration that the world is one family). He compared Halacha (Jewish law as the living framework for daily ethical conduct) to dharma (the Hindu concept of moral order and personal duty).

What he was pointing at is that both civilizations solved the same problem in remarkably similar ways. How do you build a society where ethics isn’t a sermon delivered on a holy day but a practice embedded in the texture of ordinary life? Both Judaism and Hinduism answered: Through law, through duty, through the 10,000 small decisions that make up a day.

This is not a coincidence that gets discovered at diplomatic summits. It is a structural similarity, centuries deep.

For a reader of hassidic thought, this lands with particular force. Hassidism (Hassidut, or hassidic teaching and philosophy) calls this avodah (literally “work,” meaning inner spiritual intention expressed through practical deeds).

The Baal Shem Tov, the 18th-century founder of Hassidut, taught that the divine is found not in retreat from the world but in full engagement with it, in the marketplace, at the table, in the way you treat the person standing in front of you. Modi, without using that language, was honoring exactly that tradition and pointing out that India built its civilization on the same foundation.

He connected Hanukkah and Diwali (the Hindu festival of lights, celebrating the victory of light over darkness), and the pairing is more than poetic.

Both festivals reject the passive response to darkness. In the Hanukkah story, the rabbis made a specific decision: The mitzvah (religious commandment) is not to light a large fire but to add one small candle each night, incrementally, publicly, stubbornly. That is a philosophy of historical action. Darkness is not defeated all at once. It is pushed back by accumulated small acts of light.

Diwali carries the same logic, rows of diyas (small clay oil lamps) lit across millions of homes, each one a separate act that adds to a larger illumination.

He paired Purim with Holi (the Hindu spring festival, marking the triumph of good over evil), and here, too, the intellectual connection runs even deeper. Both holidays are built on the experience of hiddenness suddenly reversed.

In the Purim story, God’s name never appears in the Book of Esther. The miracle is concealed inside what looks like ordinary palace politics and human decision-making. Hassidic thought reads this as the deepest kind of truth: that providence (hashgacha pratit, divine guidance in the details of individual lives) often looks, from the outside, like coincidence or history. You only see the pattern when you’re willing to look for it.

Modi’s insistence on ancient connections between India and Israel, on trade routes and shared texts, and a Persian queen named Esther, whose Hebrew name connects to the Hebrew word for “hidden,” carries the same idea. Some relationships are written into history long before the diplomats arrive to formalize them.

HE SPOKE about terrorism plainly, without softening the language. He linked the October 7 massacre to the Mumbai attacks, India’s own wound, still felt. He said no cause justifies the murder of civilians. He said terrorism anywhere threatens peace everywhere. He said it the way people say things they’ve believed for a long time and have stopped needing to rehearse.

Then he did something that moved the room more than any of the formal declarations. He singled out the Indian workers and caregivers who were in Israel on October 7, 2023. People who stayed. Who helped. Who didn’t run. He quoted the Talmud: Whoever saves one life saves an entire world.

In hassidic terms, this was the speech’s most important moment. Hassidut puts enormous weight on the deed that looks small but carries cosmic significance, the nitzotz (spark of holiness) hidden inside the ordinary act, waiting to be elevated by the person who chooses to do it anyway.

He took foreign workers in a war zone and made them the moral center of the relationship between two nations. That is not rhetoric. That is a worldview that knows where to look for what matters.

He also said something that Israel’s friends don’t always say out loud. Jewish communities lived in India for centuries, he told the Knesset, without persecution, without fear, without having to hide who they were. They preserved their faith and participated fully in society. He called it a source of pride for India.

He was right to call it that, and he was right to say it in Jerusalem in 2026, when the question of where in the world Jewish life can be lived openly has rarely felt more urgent.

Back in the suite, the conversation was warm. He has the quality of making a scheduled meeting feel like an actual conversation. When I told him the Knesset speech felt historic, he returned to the same idea he’d opened with: that the two civilizations are more similar than most people realize. He said it like someone reporting back from a conclusion he’d reached a long time ago and finally found the right room to say it in.

Our Wednesday cover had already been moving fast across social media before I walked into that suite. Modi reposted it to his enormous following on X/Twitter. Indian media picked it up. A front page can travel like that now, faster than anything you write underneath it.

The two handwritten lines are something else. They sit on paper, in a hotel room in Jerusalem, written standing up by a man who didn’t need to write anything and chose to write that. Humanity first. Democracy is permanent. One Hanukkah candle, one diya, same dark night, same instinct to keep adding light to it one careful flame at a time.

I tested the pen before I gave it to him.

Turns out he didn’t need my help.

(Mr. Zvika Klein is the Jerusalem Post Editor-in-Chief. The views expressed are personal.)

Source: The Jerusalem Post